영어질문있습니다.~(태.v1.day8. 10번)
-
게시물 수정 , 삭제는 로그인 필요
사실 영어자체에 대한 질문은 아닙니다.
우선 지문을 좀 올려드려 보겠습니다.
===============================================================
10.
주어진 문장이 들어갈 곳으로 가장 적절한 곳은?
Even if they auctioned off, say, one Nobel Prize each
year, the bought award would not be the same as the
real one
지문)
Value of honorific goods is dissolved if bought rather than earned. Suppose you desperately want a Nobel Prize but fail to get one in the usual way. It might occur to you to buy one. But you would quickly realize that it wouldn't work. The Nobel Prize is not the kind of thing that money can buy. ( ① ) You could buy the trophy if some previous winner is willing to sell it, and you could display it in your living room, but you could not buy the award itself. ( ② ) This is not only because the Nobel committee don't offer these awards for sale. ( ③ ) This market exchange would also dissolve the good that gives the prize its value. ( ④ ) This is because the Nobel Prize is an honorific good, and buying it is to undermine the good you are seeking. Once word got out that the prize had been bought, the award would no longer convey or express the honor and recognition that people receive when they are awarded a Nobel Prize.
답은 3번.
===============================================================
q)
저는 처음에 2번정도면 들어가기에 적절하다고 봤습니다.
Even if they auctioned off 에서 나온 --> they를
they를 바로 앞 문단의 some previous winner 라고 생각했고
이런 관점을 가지고 --> 주어진 이 문장을 해석해보면
Even if they auctioned off, say, one Nobel Prize each
year, the bought award would not be the same as the
real one
이전의 노벨상 수상자들로부터,, (통계적으로) 매년 하나씩 경매에 물건이 나온다고 하더라도
구매된 상은 진짜와 가치가 같지는 않을 것이다...
라고 해석했으며,, 전혀 이상해 보이지가 않습니다.
3번이 답이 안된다고 부정하는것은 아닙니다.
다만 2번으로 해도 전혀 문제가 없어 보인다는게 질문의 요지입니다.
선생님께서 보셨을때
답이 2번으로 두었을때 과연 어색한게 있을까요??
q2)
Once word got out that the prize had been bought,
일단 그 상이 구매되었다는 소식이 알려지면,
이라고 해석되는 부분입니다.
그런데 word를 어떻게 해석해야 할지 모르겠습니다.
단어"라는 기본적인 뜻이 아닌듯합니다.
word got out?
Value of honorific goods is dissolved if bought rather than earned. Suppose you desperately want a Nobel Prize but fail to get one in the usual way. It might occur to you to buy one. But you would quickly realize that it wouldn't work. The Nobel Prize is not the kind of thing that money can buy. ( ① ) You could buy the trophy if some previous winner is willing to sell it, and you could display it in your living room, but you could not buy the award itself. ( ② ) This is not only because the Nobel committee don't offer these awards for sale. ( ③ ) This market exchange would also dissolve the good that gives the prize its value. ( ④ ) This is because the Nobel Prize is an honorific good, and buying it is to undermine the good you are seeking. Once word got out that the prize had been bought, the award would no longer convey or express the honor and recognition that people receive when they are awarded a Nobel Prize.
답은 3번.
===============================================================
q)
저는 처음에 2번정도면 들어가기에 적절하다고 봤습니다.
Even if they auctioned off 에서 나온 --> they를
they를 바로 앞 문단의 some previous winner 라고 생각했고
이런 관점을 가지고 --> 주어진 이 문장을 해석해보면
3번이 답이 안된다고 부정하는것은 아닙니다.
다만 2번으로 해도 전혀 문제가 없어 보인다는게 질문의 요지입니다.
선생님께서 보셨을때
답이 2번으로 두었을때 과연 어색한게 있을까요??
q2)
Once word got out that the prize had been bought,
일단 그 상이 구매되었다는 소식이 알려지면,
이라고 해석되는 부분입니다.
그런데 word를 어떻게 해석해야 할지 모르겠습니다.
단어"라는 기본적인 뜻이 아닌듯합니다.
word got out?
